Knowledge Management for Technology and Structure-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theKnowledge Management for Technology and Structure. Answer: Critique of Analysis Knowledge management refers to the systematic management of an organizations knowledge asset in a bid to create value and strategies towards success through enabling information and knowledge flow between people at the right time. Implementation of knowledge management calls for selection of the right people, processes, technology, structure, and a matching culture to initiate knowledge transfer (Alavi Leidner, 2001). The analysis on the knowledge management remains incorrect and likely to cause a crisis. Uninstalling of the knowledge management system is not the best remedy for the situation. Knowledge management might result in a slough if it is implemented in a wrong manner and will require structural changes as a result. The decrease in return on investment might be cause by a wrong implementation strategy and consideration in place (Alavi Leidner, 2001). Selecting the wrong people or target group, improper use of technology, structures, and lack of preparation can result in a disruption. Hence, it is proper to consider a number of factors during an implementation stage. The right people for the change have to be selected to ensure the right influence of knowledge to others. At the same time, individuals in the organization ought to be prepared for change and their concerns addressed for full implementation to take place. An organizations culture should be changed progressively to match the knowledge acquisition required (Donate de Pablo, 2015). At the same time, use of the right model of communication and technology has to be applied along with involved individuals undergoing training to match the required change. Initiating change with the wrong communication channel leads to reduced productivity among workers. Thus, a knowledge sharing culture has to be cultivated and the right procedures involved in achieving the benefits of knowledge management. Thus, the organization should focus on strengthening the system through a monitoring and evaluation plan to ascertain the steps missed during implementation and take necessary changes. Knowledge management remains of essence to organizations and thus cannot be trashed away. Pros and Cons of Transfer Process Socialization is the most probable means of knowledge transfer. The process involves personal presence of an expert with the persons in need of knowledge thus fostering an easy transfer of tacit knowledge. The process is important as individuals can observe, act, and ask questions in the process of implementation. The ease of association assists in grabbing much knowledge on given aspects. However, it is difficult for the tacit knowledge to be passed over to people in distant locations given the presence needed between an expert and the other party in need of knowledge (Webb, 2017). Moreover, using simple forms to communicate a given message assists in getting the layout on target issues and processes involved in the provided information. The documentation assists in future referencing and understanding of key aspects of a process. However, the process remains challenging in the acquisition of tacit knowledge as the real and practical knowledge and skills remain hard to transfer (Martn-de Castro, 2015). As a result, half knowledge is passed leading to lack of experience and real time transfer of knowledge. Best Approach A direct transfer through socialization is probable as persons of similar tasks can grasp aspects quickly through observation as well as actual engagement in a particular knowledge process. The lesson learned approach can also assist in ensuring that the mistakes made are not repeated and thus boost the process and speed of knowledge acquisition. Transfer to Multiple Parties I would recommend socialization accompanied with showing your work approach. As a result, apart from giving out instructions, an individual is expected to generate a video or visual explanation of the task being tackled. The recipient individuals all over the world can repeatedly watch one doing and compare with the explicit knowledge thus gaining experience therein. The approach not only provides internalization but also gives a procedural approach to the recipients of knowledge. References Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 107-136. Donate, M. J., de Pablo, J. D. S. (2015). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 360-370. Martn-de Castro, G. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143-146. Webb, S. P. (2017). Knowledge management: Linchpin of change. Routledge.